Login With Facebook
cnibronze
Media Bias
FAIR, Alex Kane – After the news broke that New York Times Jerusalem bureau chief Ethan Bronner had a son who enlisted in the Israeli army (Extra!, 1/27/10), Times public editor Clark Hoyt noted (2/6/10) that it was problematic for Bronner to continue reporting on “one of the world’s most intense” conflicts while his son took up arms for one side. Hoyt spoke to a former Times Jerusalem bureau chief, David Shipler, who stressed the importance of disclosing this relationship to readers. Bronner is now close to the end of his tenure in Jerusalem. But two years after that controversy, the New York Times has yet to learn the importance of disclosure. And the concealed relationship again concerns a Times reporter who writes from Jerusalem: This time, it’s correspondent Isabel Kershner. Kershner has a record of misleading reporting (Extra!, 7/10, 4/11, 1/12) that reflects the New York Times’ bias toward the Israeli government perspective. But even more damning is this: Her husband, Hirsh Goodman, works for the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) as a senior research fellow and director of the Charles and Andrea Bronfman Program on Information Strategy, tasked with shaping a positive image of Israel in the…
Monday, 23 April 2012 09:42

How BBC views Gaza through a Zionist looking glass Featured

Written by
EI - Watching, reading or listening to a BBC report on Israel’s occupation of Palestine is like stepping through the Zionist looking-glass and witnessing not the reality of the situation, but Israel’s totally distorted version of it.
  Mondoweiss - Ethan Bronner may be on his way out, but the New York Times’ habitualdeferenceto the Israeli government’s line isn't about to leave with him. The latest example: Isabel Kershner and Fares Akram’s coverage of the recent Israeli air raids on the Gaza Strip.
Tuesday, 13 March 2012 11:00

Top ten media failures in the Iran war debate Featured

Written by
Foreign Policy - I did a brief interview for All Things Considered last Friday, on the topic of media handling of the current war scare over Iran. Here's a link to the story, which ran over the weekend. The interview got me thinking about the issue of media coverage of this whole business, and I'm sorry to say that most mainstream news organizations have let us down again.
Friday, 09 March 2012 09:05

Senator James Abourezk: "Palling Around with Terrorists" Featured

Written by
In his third no-holds-barred column for CNI, Senator James Abourezk tells of his inside experiences with terrorists, alleged terrorists, and the Israel Lobby, including anecdotes about Menachem Begin, George Habash, the Washington Post, the assassin of UN mediator Count Folke Bernadotte, and the Achille Lauro. Senator Abourezk's first column in his "Tales of the Isreal Lobby" series for CNI was "Firsthand Account: Israeli Plot to Murder Former US Senator?" and his second was "Threats, Dershowitz, & Embedded Lobbyists."
CounterPunch, by ALISON WEIR – Michael Lerner, the editor of Tikkun Magazine, is known for his frequent condemnations of Israeli violence against Palestinians. He is labeled “pro-Palestinian” for such statements and is regularly attacked by pro-Israel zealots who charge that he is disloyal to the Jewish state. Yet, in reality, Lerner frequently speaks of his devotion to Israel and states that his actions are taken in considerable part to protect it. A while ago Lerner explained the difference in his feelings about Israelis compared to his feelings about Palestinians. “[T]here is a difference in my emotional and spiritual connection to these two sides,” Lerner said. “On the one side is my family; on the other side are decent human beings. I want to support human beings all over the planet but I have a special connection to my family.” This statement comes to mind when one considers the New York Times bureau chiefs who cover Israel-Palestine.
Tuesday, 07 February 2012 10:17

Iran: This Is What Propaganda Looks Like Featured

Written by
FAIR - Alarmist corporate media coverage of the "threat" from Iran is everywhere, thanks to a Senate appearance yesterday by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. But Clapper said very little in his remarks that would justify the propagandistic coverage we're seeing.  His main point was that Iran could launch attacks if it felt threatened. It is hard to see how this is particularly surprising. Clapper pointed to the alleged Iranian plot to kill the Saudi ambassador in Washington D.C. as evidence that Iran seems more eager to assert itself, perhaps even inside the United States. But there were many people who raised serious questions about that rather implausible scenario (which involved hiring a Mexican drug gang to carry out the assassination).
Consortium News, Ray McGovern –  Recent comments by U.S and Israeli military leaders indicate that the intelligence services of the two countries agree that Iran has not decided to build a nuclear bomb, a crack in the Western narrative that the U.S. press corps won’t accept, as ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern explains.
Saturday, 28 January 2012 08:57

Open letter to WSJ for endorsing murder of Iranian scientist

Written by
Harakah Daily, S.M. Mohamed Idris, Penang – In the opinion piece of the Wall Street Journal entitled 'The Intrigues of Persia' [16 January 2012] on the murder of the Iranian scientist Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, it is written:“His death will serve a useful purpose if it convinces a critical mass of his colleagues to cease pursuing an atomic critical mass. That wouldn’t be a bad way to bring the confrontation over Iran’s nuclear program to a peaceful conclusion.”Applying the same logic, would assassinating journalists who become cheer leaders for illegal wars serve a useful purpose if it can stop such wars?
Fox commentator Eric Boling provides Israei Deputy Knesset Speaker Danny Dannon with an opportunity to criticize Ron Paul's statements favoring the application of the Christian Golden Rule to US foreign policies. Numerous secular analysts and government officials, aware of the history of damaging "blowback" from misguided US policies, also favor Paul's approach.
Salon - Last month, my Salon colleague Justin Elliott revealed that AIPAC’s former spokesman, Josh Block, had been encouraging neoconservative journalists and pundits on a private email list to attack as “anti-Semites” various Middle East commentators employed by two of the most influential Democratic-Party-aligned organizations: the Center for American Progress (CAP) and Media Matters (MM).
AntiWar - In an article in Sunday’s New York Times co-signed by Isabel Kershner and Ethan Bronner, the readers of the “Paper of Record” were informed that “Israelis are turning inward and discovering that an issue they had neglected — the place of the ultra-Orthodox Jews — has erupted into a crisis.”
Tuesday, 20 December 2011 09:15

Will the media let Ron Paul question US foreign policy? Featured

Written by
Republican candidate Ron Paul, unlike other members of his party, is critical of US support for Israel. Al Jazeera - Will the news media let Ron Paul raise serious questions about US foreign policy? It's a crucial test case not only of the prospects that the media will serve the interests of the 99 per cent rather than the 1 per cent, but of the prospects for a foreign military and economic policy that reflects the values and interests of the 99 per cent, rather than those of the 1 per cent.
Craig Murray – Taking on the Zionist lobby head-on is well nigh impossible. I have written a stunning piece on Werritty, Israel and a neo-con plot to attack Iran. It contains information not published anywhere, even here. I have circulated it to several national newspapers, for each of which I have written many times. I have never had a piece refused before.
Shanker has been an embedded journalist both with the US military and with various think tanks whose policies he is reporting on.
Page 1 of 3

More On Media Bias

Twitter Facebook Youtube MySpace Google+ Orkut